A systematic review of the Heart Manual literature.

OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of the Heart Manual, a self help, home based cardiac rehabilitation programme, with hospital based cardiac rehabilitation programmes. Comparisons were made on key psychological, behavioural, biological, service and cost outcomes. METHOD A systematic review was conducted. Nine electronic databases and the internet were searched. Non published trials of the Heart Manual were sourced from the Heart Manual department and additional experts in the field were contacted. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled trials and clinical trials were included if they compared the Heart Manual to another type of cardiac rehabilitation. RESULTS Seven studies, including two RCTs, met the inclusion criteria. The RCTs found no significant difference between the Heart Manual and hospital based cardiac rehabilitation. The remaining studies showed mixed results. There was no strong evidence that the Heart Manual was any less effective than hospital based cardiac rehabilitation on any of the outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS Evidence from two RCTs suggests the Heart Manual is as effective as hospital based cardiovascular rehabilitation on a number of psychological, behavioural, biological, service and cost outcomes. Future research, such as RCTs carried out on an international scale, should be undertaken to further assess the Heart Manual's efficacy.